Nfs Fsstat Failed For Server Error 27
The message can also be reported for UDP. this has been working fine until today, when my workstation tries to mount the nfs mount the following error is logged in /var/adm/message NFS lookup failed for server comserv: error 7 More discussions in Installation All PlacesServer & Storage SystemsOracle SolarisInstallation This discussion is archived 0 Replies Latest reply on Dec 3, 2008 8:02 AM by 807559 NFS-Problem 807559 Dec 3, 2008 Sure enough, the timestamps on both files were changed. http://windowsazure4j.org/failed-for/nfs-fsstat-failed-for-server-error-3.html
Novell makes all reasonable efforts to verify this information. Also, see the description of the nolargefiles option in mount Options for NFS File Systems.mount: ... there seems to be an issued w/ SAMBA. Legal Notices Skip navigationOracle Community DirectoryOracle Community FAQLog inRegisterMy Oracle Support Community (MOSC)SearchSearchCancelGo Directly To Oracle Technology Network CommunityMy Oracle Support CommunityOPN Cloud ConnectionOracle Employee CommunityOracle User Group CommunityTopliners CommunityOTN Speaker https://community.hpe.com/t5/Serviceguard/NFS-access-failed-for-server-xxx-error-7-RPC-Authentication/td-p/5267297
Nfs Fsstat Failed For Server Error 7 (rpc: Authentication Error)
mount: ...: Permission denied Description: Your computer name might not be in the list of clients or netgroup that is allowed access to the file system you tried to mount. GBiz is too! Latest News Stories: Docker 1.0Heartbleed Redux: Another Gaping Wound in Web Encryption UncoveredThe Next Circle of Hell: Unpatchable SystemsGit 2.0.0 ReleasedThe Linux Foundation Announces Core Infrastructure cause During a scripted update of NW6SP3, the NFS daemon load-line had somehow been deleted from the autoexec.ncf. When to stop rolling a die in a game where 6 loses everything Too Many Staff Meetings Equalizing unequal grounds with batteries Where are sudo's insults stored?
Please enter a title. You can use access control lists to provide the needed access privileges.nfs mount: NFS can't support "nolargefiles" Description: An NFS client has attempted to mount a file system from an NFS Rather than fail the mount, this warning is generated to warn you that locking does not work. Nfs Fsinfo Failed For Server Error 7 Rpc Authentication Error goal Unable to mount NFS volumes.
The fix was to add my IPv6 subnet to /etc/exports on the NFS server: /export/opencsw-current 192.168.3.0/24(rw,nohide,insecure,no_subtree_check,async) 2001:X:Y:Z::/64(rw,nohide,insecure,no_subtree_check,async) share|improve this answer answered Feb 26 '12 at 19:52 automatthias 3711510 add a comment| fact NetWare 6.0 NW6SP3 symptom Since reboot of the NetWare server, NFS clients have been unable to mount volumes. All rights reserved. The message is advisory only.
Protter Exalted Contributor [Founder] Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe to RSS Feed Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content 12-21-2010 06:06 AM 12-21-2010 06:06 AM Re: NFS Nfs Compound Failed For Server Error 5 Solution: To fix this problem, you must update the services data in the namespace. I will summarise. A witcher and their apprentice… Hexagonal minesweeper Meditation and 'not trying to change anything' Is it legal to bring board games (made of wood) to Australia?
Nfs Compound Failed For Server Error 7 (rpc Authentication Error)
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 96 Dec 20 18:52 tst[rueccqas]# chmod 744 tstchmod: can't change tst: Read-only file systemPlease advicePrashant Good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment. 0 https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1454/rfsadmin-255.html i have edit the /etc/dfs/dfstab file withshare -F nfs -o rw=ruleccqas /export/usr/sap/transand then sucessfully mount file styemruprddb:/export/usr/sap/trans 20905984 7417065 12645898 37% /usr/sap/trans_newbut below error come while changeing file permission. Nfs Fsstat Failed For Server Error 7 (rpc: Authentication Error) Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Nfs Getattr Failed For Server Error 5 (rpc Timed Out) Why aren't there direct flights connecting Honolulu, Hawaii and London, UK?
Showing results for Search instead for Do you mean Menu Categories Solutions IT Transformation Internet of Things Topics Big Data Cloud Security Infrastructure Strategy and Technology Products Cloud Integrated Systems Networking this content If it has wheels or a skirt, you can't afford it. 0 Kudos Reply The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Restarted the NFS daemons on server: abcd 3. Currently, a user can be in no more than 16 groups if the user is accessing files through NFS mounts. Rpc Authentication Error Solaris
If I do a df -k I get the following output: abcd:root:/etc/rc2.d => df -k Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/md/dsk/d0 8261393 7341688 837092 90% / /proc 0 0 Perhaps a speed, duplex, or autonegotiate problem between the NFS server and it's switch? current community blog chat Server Fault Meta Server Fault your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. weblink Any thoughts?Many thanks! 0 Kudos Reply All Forum Topics Previous Topic Next Topic 6 REPLIES mark lenderman_2 Occasional Visitor Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe to RSS Feed Highlight Print
Regards, Alan. _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list [email protected] http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers Previous Message by Thread: /etc/path_to_inst and pti.old changed... Browse other questions tagged solaris nfs or ask your own question. Start troubleshooting with How to Check Connectivity on an NFS Client.NFS server recovering Description: During part of the NFS version 4 server reboot, some operations were not permitted.
If the port numbers do not match, the mount fails.
- This error message is rare and has no straightforward solution.Could not use public filehandle in request to server Description: This message is displayed if the public option is specified but the
- solaris nfs share|improve this question edited Feb 26 '12 at 19:50 asked Feb 26 '12 at 18:15 automatthias 3711510 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 1
- Solution: Wait for the server to reboot.
- Mounting the file system read-write increases the likelihood that a file could change.
- Solution: Upgrade the server with a new version of the OS that provides complete lock manager support.
- Thanks in advancePrashant Good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment.
- This error message is rare and has no straightforward solution.error checking lock file: error Description: This message is displayed when the lock file that is associated with a daemon cannot be
- I will summarise.
This message indicates that the server is recalling a delegation for another client that conflicts with a request from your client. Solution: The soft option requires that the mount fail immediately when a timeout starts, so you cannot include the -soft option with a replicated mount.share_nfs: Cannot share more than one filesystem thanks for your help guys. 0 Kudos Reply Jeff Schussele Honored Contributor [Founder] Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe to RSS Feed Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate As you mention, the SAMBA users also complain about intermittent problems.A duplicate address, come to think of it is not the only thing.
Solution: Either change the command to make the port numbers identical or do not specify the port number that is incorrect. Copyright © 2002, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. You cannot use directory names.Cannot establish NFS service over /dev/tcp: transport setup problem Description: This message is often created when the services information in the namespace has not been updated. http://windowsazure4j.org/failed-for/nfs-fsstat-failed-for-server-error-7.html Restarted the NFS daemons on server: abcd 3.
Solution: You must use version 3 or version 4 if access to large files is required.NFS server hostname not responding still trying Description: If programs hang while doing file-related work, your Good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment. 0 Kudos The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. I will summarise. Since both files are exactly the same size and have the same contents, I cannot diff the old and the new file to see what might have changed.
However, if I share specifically for machine 'abcd' (-o rw=abcd) I get the errors as below. This message indicates that NFS server hostname is down or that a problem has occurred with the server or the network. pernasivam AIX 1 06-18-2009 09:09 AM problem in finding a hardware problem girish.batra Solaris 8 09-09-2008 10:10 AM SSH Problem auth problem budrito UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 1 03-17-2004 Thanks, Peter Checking nfsd: [email protected]:/# rpcinfo -T tcp filer406 nfs program 100003 version 2 ready and waiting program 100003 version 3 ready and waiting [email protected]:/# rpcinfo -T udp filer406 nfs program
drwxr--r-- 2 root bin 1024 Dec 20 17:29 tmp[ruprddb]# chmod 777 tmpchmod: can't change tmp: Read-only file system[ruprddb]# pwd/usr/sap/trans[ruprddb]#same error occur in client drwxr-xr-x 2 rrqadm sapsys 8192 Dec 22 10:46 it is showing same error. [rueccqas]# chown 744 tmptmp: Read-only file system[rueccqas]# pwd/usr/sap/trans_newPrashant Good judgment comes from experience and experience comes from bad judgment. 0 Kudos kemo Trusted Contributor [Founder] Options our users often report problems authenticating to the Samba server to access CIFS data files. Restarted the NFS daemons on server: wxyz 2.
Only one public file handle can be established per server, so only one file system per server can be shared with this option.WARNING: No network locking on hostname:path: contact admin to Try till success... 0 Kudos Reply mark lenderman_2 Occasional Visitor Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe to RSS Feed Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content 02-09-2004 06:27 My security software reported that the /etc/path_to_inst and /etc/path_to_inst.old files changed on an old sparc5 running well-patched Solaris 8.